在非定量管理过程上的OID活动叫做OPF

引自Patrick OToole

"OID activities, when applied to non-quantitatively managed processes, is called OPF"

在非定量管理过程上的OID活动叫做OPF

Organizational OID activities modifya stable, quantitatively managed process or process infrastructure (e.g., tools) such thatthe process achieves a statistically significant enhanced level of performance. (I.e., there is a statistically significant shift in the center line of the control chart, or a statistically significant reduction in process variation).

组织OID活动修改一个稳定的/定量管理的过程或者过程基础设施(比如工具), 这个修改导致了统计学上的显著提高.

比如在控制图中线上有统计显著的提升,或者统计显著的缩小了过程变化范围.

So, my take on your examples is:

1. Major process change

Maybe - depends on whether or not the process is stable and quantitatively managed, and if the objective ofthe change is to achieve a statistically enhanced level of performance (as one would expect a major enhancement would do). If the process being enhance is notstable and/or is not quantitatively managed, then it's more likely OPF than OID.

2. Implementation of a new measure...

No, implementation of a new measure is not an example of OID. MA or OPP perhaps, but not OID. Introducing a new measure does not, in isolation, change process performance. (It may help us understand it better, but its implementation in isolation does not CHANGE performance).

3. Implementation of some tools for data analysis...

No, tools to enhance data analysis does not, in and of itself, result in an enhanced level of performance. The reasoning here is equivalent to that provided in #2 above. "Efficiency tools," on the other hand, would bebetter examples of potential OID activities - subjected to the caveats stated under #1.

4. Implementation of any automated tool to capture SDLC phases information...

Maybe, if the objective is to achieve higher levels of process effectiveness or efficiency, or higher levels of process or product quality. (Subject to caveats in #1 above). If all it is doing is "capturing information..." then the answer is probably no. However, your example of an automated tool for requirements management would typically do a whole lot more than merely "capture information" - it would hopefully enhance performance.

5. "Implementation/upations into existing processes as in Training system modifications, etc."

I do notunderstand thisstatement as written.

HOWEVER, if I take a guess at what you were driving at...it is very difficult for me to believe that updating training on an existing process, with no other changes to the process, might be considered OID. That is, if the existing training was inadequate, then that's simply addressing GP2.5 of the related process area. On the other hand, if the training involves teaching people new methods or techniques, then we're probably back to the answer provided in #1. Training MAY be a way to reduce variability in process execution. That's probably going to fall into QPM (or OPP), but MAY fall under OID as well.

Hope this helps.

Pat